{"id":27732,"date":"2020-09-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-09-09T21:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aleksawn.bget.ru\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii\/"},"modified":"2026-10-23T11:26:07","modified_gmt":"2026-10-23T08:26:07","slug":"the-most-expensive-photographs-in-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii\/","title":{"rendered":"TOP 10 Most Expensive Photographs in History"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Fine art photography is a strange and volatile market that can change very quickly. While most photographs sell for reasonable prices, some inflate to prices most photographers can only dream of.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in February 2018, a group of 10 investors paid $1 million for a cryptographic photograph called The Forever Rose, taken by Kevin Abosch. The Forever Rose is not a physical photograph, but the most expensive virtual image in the world. Each investor received a &quot;token&quot; that they could hold or sell.<\/p>\n<p>However, even $1 million is small change compared to the amounts paid for the most expensive photographs in history.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"10_%C2%AB%D0%9E%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE_%D0%B2_%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%C2%BB_%D0%AD%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4_%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B9%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BD\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>10. &quot;The Lake in the Moonlight&quot; by Edward Steichen<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The photo is valued at $2.9 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;The Lake in the Moonlight&quot; by Edward Steichen\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c70de49fd.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;The Lake in the Moonlight&quot; by Edward Steichen\" width=\"696\" height=\"561\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>The list of the most expensive photographs in history begins with a picture taken back in 1904 and sold in 2006.<\/p>\n<p>Steichen was one of the first photographers (if not the first) to use Autochrome. To colorize his photographs, he applied potato starch granules filled with different colors of ink to the film. Two copies of this photograph exist: one was sold at Sotheby&#039;s, and the other is in the permanent collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"9_%C2%AB%D0%A7%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B6%D0%B0_III%C2%BB_%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B0%D1%81_%D0%93%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>9. &quot;The Chicago Stock Exchange III&quot; by Andreas Gursky<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The photograph sold for $3.3 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00abChicago Stock Exchange III by Andreas Gursky\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c70e3ad91.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00abChicago Stock Exchange III by Andreas Gursky\" width=\"696\" height=\"385\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>Gursky&#039;s first, but not last, work in the collection of the world&#039;s most expensive photographs. The image depicts the trading floor of the Chicago Stock Exchange. To convey a sense of movement, the artist double-exposed several parts of the image.<\/p>\n<p>As with his other photographs on this list, Gursky also altered the colors to make them more vibrant.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"8_%C2%AB99_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%85%C2%BB_%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B0%D1%81_%D0%93%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>8. &quot;99 Cents. Diptych&quot; by Andreas Gursky<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The photograph was sold at auction for $3.3 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;99 Cents. Diptych&quot; by Andreas Gursky\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c70e98ba8.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;99 Cents. Diptych&quot; by Andreas Gursky\" width=\"618\" height=\"696\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>This is a chromogenic color print, styled as a diptych and consisting of two photographs. It is very large\u20142.07 x 3.37 meters. The action takes place in a Los Angeles store where goods are sold for 99 cents.<\/p>\n<p>Gursky uses semi-symmetrical lines and colorful packaging on the shelves to create a high-contrast image that is sure to attract attention.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"7_%C2%AB%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B9%C2%BB_%D0%A0%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>7. &quot;Untitled (Cowboy)&quot; by Richard Prince<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Sold at Christie&#039;s for $3.4 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;Untitled (Cowboy)&quot; by Richard Prince\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c70f58741.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;Untitled (Cowboy)&quot; by Richard Prince\" width=\"696\" height=\"464\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>Richard Prince began his foray into artistry at Time-Life, Inc., where his job involved clipping magazine articles for staff writers. As a budding photographer, Prince studied what remained of magazines after the articles were clipped\u2014the advertising pages.<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab&quot;Cowboy&quot; represents the pinnacle of Prince&#039;s fascination with American archetypes, and the photograph is actually a Time magazine ad featuring a Marlboro Man. The work is &quot;in its broadest sense, a meditation on the culture&#039;s persistent attraction to spectacle over lived experience.&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, the photographer who took the first publicity photo didn&#039;t appreciate high art and sued Prince for using a copyrighted image. But the court ruled in Prince&#039;s favor.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"6_%C2%AB%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D1%91%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%85_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%C2%BB_%D0%94%D0%B6%D0%B5%D1%84%D1%84_%D0%A3%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BB\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>6. &quot;Conversations of Dead Soldiers&quot; by Jeff Wall<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Price: $3.6 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;Dead Soldiers&#039; Conversations&quot; by Jeff Wall\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c70fd8087.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;Dead Soldiers&#039; Conversations&quot; by Jeff Wall\" width=\"696\" height=\"381\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>This photograph, taken by Canadian photographer Jeff Wall in 1992, depicts a fictional resurrection scene of a Red Army patrol ambushed near Moqor, Afghanistan, in the winter of 1986. The reanimated soldiers converse with each other, oblivious to their grievous wounds and severed limbs.<\/p>\n<p>Wall had never been to Afghanistan, and the actors portraying the soldiers were filmed in a studio.<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab&quot;I didn&#039;t make dead soldiers talk to comment on the Afghan war. I did it because I wanted to photograph dead people talking. It was a theme or an image, or both, that arose spontaneously, I don&#039;t know why. So the painting had a personal or internal starting point,&quot; the photographer said in an interview with Photoworks.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"5_%C2%AB%D0%94%D0%BB%D1%8F_%D0%95%D0%B5_%D0%92%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0%C2%BB_%D0%93%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88_%D0%B8_%D0%94%D0%B6%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B6_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%80\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>5. For Her Majesty, Gilbert Proche and George Passmore<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The photo costs $3.7 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;For Her Majesty&quot; by Gilbert Proche and George Passmore\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c71060da2.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;For Her Majesty&quot; by Gilbert Proche and George Passmore\" width=\"696\" height=\"399\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>Gilbert and George are partners in life and work in performance photography, but the couple are adamant that they are &quot;two people, one artist,&quot; as George told Reuters.<\/p>\n<p>And as a single artist, they created an entire collage of black-and-white photographs dedicated to the memory of the duo&#039;s alcoholic binge in the early 1970s. Thus, Gilbert and George are simultaneously subjects and objects, art and creators of their paintings, as they prefer to call them.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"4_%C2%AB%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%E2%84%96_96%C2%BB_%D0%A1%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8_%D0%A8%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>4. &quot;Untitled No. 96&quot; by Cindy Sherman<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The photograph was purchased for $3.9 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;Untitled No. 96&quot; by Cindy Sherman\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c710d6ff1.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;Untitled No. 96&quot; by Cindy Sherman\" width=\"696\" height=\"375\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>Known for her provocative self-portraits, Sherman&#039;s works are extremely popular among collectors. According to Bloomberg, she once fetched $13.7 million at a single auction.<\/p>\n<p>Sherman was responsible for all aspects of her photographs, including makeup, hair, lighting, staging, and the actual photography.<\/p>\n<p>When creating &quot;Untitled #96,&quot; the photographer was inspired by the spreads of men&#039;s erotic magazines. In the photograph, she appears the complete opposite of the models who typically pose for such publications. Many people claim that Sherman&#039;s facial expression and body language convey vulnerability and fear.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"3_%C2%AB%D0%94%D1%83%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%90%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%C2%BB_%D0%A0%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>3. &quot;Spiritual America&quot; by Richard Prince<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The photo was valued at $3.9 million at Christie&#039;s auction.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00abSpiritual America by Richard Prince\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c71164c17.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00abSpiritual America by Richard Prince\" width=\"696\" height=\"313\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>In one of the most controversial photographs in history, 10-year-old Brooke Shields posed for the photographer. Her naked, childish body contrasts sharply with her seductive, mature expression, accented by heavy makeup.<\/p>\n<p>The title &quot;Spiritual America&quot; is taken from another work: a photograph of a gelded workhorse taken by Alfred Stieglitz in 1923. The image and title contrast each other, comparing hard, honest work with the easy way people today achieve fame and glory.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"2_%C2%AB%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BD_II%C2%BB_%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B0%D1%81_%D0%93%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>2. \u00abRhine II\u00bb, Andreas Gursky<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Price: $4.3 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;Rhine II&quot;, Andreas Gursky\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c711cd232.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;Rhine II&quot;, Andreas Gursky\" width=\"696\" height=\"464\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>The most expensive work by German photographer Andreas Gursky is &quot;Rhine II,&quot; sold at Christie&#039;s in November 2011. It depicts the Rhine River flowing between green fields of grass under an overcast sky. This photograph is the first in a series of six and depicts a section of the Rhine River near D\u00fcsseldorf.<\/p>\n<p>Until the 1990s, Gursky didn&#039;t digitally alter his images, but &quot;Rhein II&quot; was an exception. Wanting to create a desolate landscape, Gursky removed distracting elements, including a factory building, pedestrians, and cyclists.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"1_%C2%AB%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC%C2%BB_%D0%9F%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80_%D0%9B%D0%B8%D0%BA\" class=\"ez-toc-section\"><\/span>1. \u00abPhantom\u00bb, Peter Lik<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The photo is worth $6.5 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"\u00ab&quot;Phantom&quot; by Peter Lik \u2013 the most expensive photograph in the history of the world\" src=\"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/samye-dorogie-fotografii-v-istorii_64f8c712560de.jpeg\" alt=\"\u00ab&quot;Phantom&quot; by Peter Lik \u2013 the most expensive photograph in the history of the world\" width=\"696\" height=\"461\" border=\"0\" ><\/p>\n<p>On December 9, 2014, a black-and-white image of Antelope Canyon in Arizona, USA, taken by renowned Australian landscape artist Peter Lik, allegedly broke all existing price records. We say &quot;allegedly&quot; because the sale was private, and only Peter himself and the lawyers involved in the transaction are known about it. Therefore, &quot;Phantom&quot;&#039;s place as the most expensive photograph in the world is still hotly debated.<\/p>\n<p>\u00abThe goal of all my photographs is to capture the power of nature and convey it in a way that inspires someone to feel moved and connected to the image,\u00bb Peter said of his work.<\/p>\n<p>A private collector acquired not only the monochrome &quot;Phantom&quot; but also two other works by Lik: &quot;Illusion&quot; for $2.4 million and &quot;Eternal Moods&quot; for $1.1 million. The total transaction value was $10 million.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fine art photography is a strange and volatile market that can change very quickly. While most photographs sell for<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":27733,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fakty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27732"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":171951,"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27732\/revisions\/171951"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bukvaved.top\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}